Skip to main content

Serrated mite (Myrmozercon serratus) and spatulate mite (Myrmozercon spatulatus) from Mexico with ant hosts

Serrated mite (Myrmozercon serratus) and spatulate mite (Myrmozercon spatulatus) from Mexico with ant hosts

NEWS - Serrated mite (Myrmozercon serratus sp. nov. Kazemi, Klompen, Pérez-Lachaud & Lachaud) and spatulate mite (Myrmozercon spatulatus sp. nov. Kazemi, Klompen, Pérez-Lachaud & Lachaud) are reported based on adult and deutonymph specimens collected with ants in Mexico as the first records of this genus from the Neotropical faunal region.

Myrmozercon Berlese 1902 is one of the most morphologically diverse genera, including 28 extant species and one extinct species. Almost all species have been collected with ants. Now researchers describe two new species associated with two sympatric formicine ant species of the genus Camponotus Mayr in Quintana Roo, southern Mexico.

M. serratus has a dorsal shield with 30–34 pairs of slightly thickened and apically blunt setae, opisthonotal setae mostly with small denticles in the distal 1/3; a wide sclerotized band of marginal striations flanking the shield dorsolaterally in female, not fused, or narrowly fused medially; band bearing 6–10 pairs of setae.

Female sternal shield wide, subrectangular, narrowly fused to endopodal plates between coxae III–IV laterally. Sternal setae short; setae st4 present. Male sternitogenital shield with 6–7 pairs of setae (one ventral seta may be present or absent), st1 on lightly sclerotized area.

Epigynal shield longer than wide (length/width ratio ≈ 1.8). Anal shield with moderately enlarged anterolateral projections; circum-anal setae thickened, blunt. With 23–30 pairs of setae on dorsal soft cuticle and about 20 pairs of setae on ventral soft cuticle.

Metapodal shields absent in female, present in male. Deutosternal groove with 15–16 rows of 6–25 minute denticles. Palp chaetotaxy from trochanter to genu: 1-5-6; tibia and tarsus palps fused dorsally. Cheliceral digits poorly sclerotized, edentate.

Female legs trochanters I–IV with 6, 5, 5, 5, femora I–IV with 14, 11, 6, 5–7 setae, genua I–IV with 13, 11, 11, 11, and tibiae I–IV with 13, 10, 10, 10 setae, respectively; basitarsus IV with 4 or 5 setae. Male with similar leg setation, but trochanter IV with 6–7 setae; setae al2 on genu and tibia I present or absent.

By a combination of characters, including long legs with hypertrichous setae, a reticulate dorsal shield, and a subrectangular sternal shield, M. serratus is a member of a species group called Myrmozercon sensu lato Joharchi, Babaeian & Seeman (2015).

Within this group, M. serratus is most similar to M. antennophoroides Berlese 1903, M. hunteri Joharchi, Babaeian & Seeman 2015 and M. patagonicus Trach & Khaustov 2018 with 30–34 pairs of setae on the dorsal shield and a subrectangular sternal shield.

Differs from M. antennophoroides by the presence of only one pair of setae on the epigynal shield (vs. two pairs in M. antennophoroides), leg I is much longer than the dorsal shield, length ratio ≈ 1.7 (vs. leg I is shorter, length ratio of leg I/dorsal shield ≈ 1.37), and the gnathotectum is subtriangular, but not elongated (vs. subtriangular and elongated).

The new species can be distinguished from M. hunteri by the presence of 6 setae on trochanter I and 13 setae on tibiae I (vs. 5 and 10 setae respectively in M. hunteri), the presence of simple setae with pointed tips on the legs (vs. most setae on legs with club-like tips) and the presence of a broad sclerotized band of marginal lines surrounding the dorsal shield (vs. absent).

M. patagonicus can be distinguished from M. serratus by the presence of 19–21 rows of denticles in the deuterosternal groove (vs. 15–16 rows in M. serratus), the presence of metapodal platelets (vs. none), 4 setae on the femoral palps (vs. 5), and also 14 setae on genua I, 7–8 setae on femora III and 8 setae on femora IV (vs. 13, 6, and 6 setae, respectively).

M. spatulatus has a dorsal shield with 27–31 pairs of slightly thickened and apically spatulate setae; wide sclerotized band of marginal striations well-developed in female (less developed in male), surrounding the shield laterally and broadly fused posteromedially; band bearing 10–12 pairs of setae.

Female sternal shield wide, moderately narrow; with relatively long sternal setae, st2–3 as long as the distance between their insertions, st1 slightly shorter than st1–2 interval. Female sternal shield adjacent to, but not fused to, endopodals between coxae III–IV. St4 setae absent.

Male sternitogenital and deutonymphal sternal shield bear five and four pairs of setae, respectively. Epigynal shield large and wide, almost as long as wide (length/width ratio ≈ 0.9). Anal shield wide, anterolateral edges well-developed, circum-anal setae thickened, apically spatulate. With 7–10 pairs of setae on dorsal and 14–16 pairs of setae on ventral soft cuticle. Metapodal shields present.

Deutosternal groove with 18–19 rows in female and deutonymph, and 15 rows in male, each row with multiple denticles; palp chaetotaxy from trochanter to genu: 1-4-5. Cheliceral digits poorly sclerotized, edentate; spermatodactyl sickle-shaped.

Female femora I–IV with 13, 10, 6–7, 8–9 setae, genua I–IV with 13, 11, 11, 11, and tibiae I–IV with 13, 10, 10, 10 setae, respectively. Leg setae, especially dorsal setae on trochanter to tibia, apically spatulate.

M. spatulatus is included in Myrmozercon sensu lato mainly on the basis of the long legs with hypertrichous setae and the reticulate dorsal shield. In this group of species, the absence of metasternal setae is similar to M. iainkayi Walter 2003 and M. beardae Shaw & Seeman 2009).

M. iainkayi can be distinguished by several characters, for example, the presence of a hypertrichous dorsal shield with simple and short setae (vs. 27–31 pairs of fairly long and spatulate setae in M. spatulatus), coxae I–IV with 6, 6, 6, and 4 setae respectively (vs. the standard coxal set of setae) and a horseshoe-shaped sternal shield (vs. only slightly concave posteriorly).

M. beardae differs from M. spatulatus by differences in the shape of the sternal, epigynal and anal shields, in addition to characters such as the shape and number of setae on the dorsal shield. M. beardae has 23–25 pairs of short and simple setae (vs. 27–31 pairs of long and spatulate setae in M. spatulatus) and a difference in the setation on coxa IV, M. beardae has 2 setae (vs. 1).

The species epithet “serratus” was chosen on the basis of the shape of most setae in the opisthonotal region of the dorsal shield. “Spatulatus” was chosen on the basis of the shape of most dorsal and opisthogastral setae.

Original research

Pérez-Lachaud G, Klompen H, Kazemi S, Lachaud J. 2024. Myrmozercon mites are highly host specific: two new species of Myrmozercon Berlese associated with sympatric Camponotus ants in southern Quintana Roo, Mexico. PeerJ 12:e18197, DOI:10.7717/peerj.18197

Dlium theDlium

Popular Posts

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) manufacture bubble-nets as tools to increase prey intake

NEWS - Humpback whales ( Megaptera novaeangliae ) create bubble net tools while foraging, consisting of internal tangential rings, and actively control the number of rings, their size, depth and horizontal spacing between the surrounding bubbles. These structural elements of the net increase prey intake sevenfold. Researchers have known that humpback whales create “bubble nets” for hunting, but the new report shows that the animals also manipulate them in a variety of ways to maximize catches. The behavior places humpbacks among the rare animals that make and use their own tools. “Many animals use tools to help them find food, but very few actually make or modify these tools themselves,” said Lars Bejder, director of the Marine Mammal Research Program (MMRP), University of Hawaii at Manoa. “Humpback whales in southeast Alaska create elaborate bubble nets to catch krill. They skillfully blow bubbles in patterns that form a web with internal rings. They actively control details such ...

Javan mocca or Javan slender caesar (Amanita javanica)

OPINION - Javan mocca or Javan slender caesar ( Amanita javanica ) is a mysterious fungus species and has been enigmatic since it was first reported by Boedijn in 1951 and after that no explanation or reporting of specimens is believed to be the same as expected. Boedijn (1951) described A. javanica which grew on Java island as having the characteristics covered in the Amanita genus. Corner and Bas in 1962 tried to describe Javan mocca and all species in Amanita based on specimens in Singapore. Over time some reports say that they have found A. javanica specimens in other Southeast Asia including also China, Japan, India and Nepal. But there is no definitive knowledge and many doubt whether the specimen is the same as described by Boedijn (1951). I was fortunate to have seen this species one afternoon and soon I took out a camera for some shots. In fact, I've only met this mushroom species once. Javan mocca is an endangered species and I have never seen in my experience in...

Javanese grasshopper (Valanga nigricornis)

Wooden grasshopper or Javanese grasshopper ( Valanga nigricornis ) is an animal species of Acrididae, grasshoppers that have at least 18 subspecies, insects with very wide diversity in color and size, sexual dimorphism in which females are larger in size and paler in color. V. nigricornis in males has a length of 45-55 millimeters and females 15-75 mm. The head is square and green or yellow or brown or black in color. A pair of antennas has a black color. The eyes are large and gray or white or brownish. The hind legs are very large and have a green or yellow or brown or black color, plain or brindle. The limbs have two rows of large and long spines with black tips facing backward. The wings have a length exceeding the belly, a rough surface and are brown or green or yellow or black in color with pulse lines forming spaces filled with black color. The hind wings are rose red which will be visible when flying. Nymphs are pale green or yellow or brown or blackish in color. Javanese gr...